Thread:Auron~Guardian/@comment-5670835-20150906222355/@comment-30185470-20150924091440

Night, staff would think otherwise. You can punish me all you want, but remember this: Who helped you build the wiki? Who tried to make you a wikia star? Who was there to guard the wiki when you weren't here? Who revealed you so many secrets? Who helped you create this wikii inot what it is today? Night, I've always been giving to the wiki, or should I say you. Don't you think you should give something back to me? I've always been giving. I think I deserve to be given something positive. You know, it's completely unfair for me to have been helping for more than a year and I don't get any thanks for it. I've always been giving to you. I've always been giving, never taking. Night, I do respect what you say and I absolutely have no interest in making you look bad? It's more like do you care in what I have to say? Remember when we used to work together? Originally, it was about stopping the bad people. When Klaus was bullying for 8 to 9 months, we agreed that he'd be blocked forever. In fact, that's something that some of the staff agreed to as well. As you can see, Sannse thought it was right for you to block him forever. But now, suddenly, you unblock him, even though you know all the trouble he caused. Giving a user that kind of treatment is completely unfair. It delivers the idea that anyone could cause trouble like that, get away with it, not get punished at all, and, as a bonus, get another chance they don't deserve, which is a terrible idea to show people. Something like that is what exactly encourages bad people to contniue their misdeeds. I don't want that and you don't want that. Look, I do believe in redemption, but there has to be a limit, otherwise, you're creating an endless cycle. Now, who wants that? In a community, if there is more than one person running it, then it's up to ALL the heads of the community to make the choices. It's not always up to the leader. For the heads to work together, they both need to take each other's ideas in consideration, whether they're irrational or not. I've always allowed you to do all the decisions. However, I haven't seen a single moment where you've taken any of my ideas and used them. The fact that you don't want to negotiate or make a compromise with me shows you don't care about me or what I say at all. This isn't working together. This is agony. For a community to work, the crats have to agree before a decision goes. If they don't agree, then there has to be an alternate approach that makes both sides happy. If a decision is passed, whether it's by the leader or not, and they don't consult with the other crats, then that's not working together. That would be more like one guy making all the decisions while the other one isn't able to help because all their thoughts are denied, which doesn't help anybody. Night, if you want all the violence to stop, if you want to make a difference, if you honestly want to continuessly call me a leader, then we're going to have to work together. That means you're going to have to accept my ideas, whether they're irrational or not because you don't really know if they'll hurt or not. You'll never know if you don't try. If they help the community, then good. If they don't, then we learn something new. We can't live in a world where every action is perfect. Being perfect doesn't exist in this world. We're supposed to live in a world where any mistake we make allows us to learn something new and use any of that to improve the future. Remember the Progressive Era? That's right, so many solutions to so many problems because people were willing to take the time to make mistakes and learn from them, and now, society improved because of mistakes. So what if I have so many flaws? I've made many mistakes and I've learned from them. Night, if you want this whole issue to stop, you're going to need to negotiate with me and make some compromise, and even tolerate anytime I say no to something you ask, otherwise, this isn't working together.