Thread:Creative Worker 97/@comment-22439-20150813092517/@comment-30185470-20150814125803

I could, but I can't because of a few reasons. One, I have an occupancy limit to wikis I edit. Sure, this is really the only wiki I edit while I post philosophy on the others, but until I'm done with my service here, this is really the best I can do. I don't want to be overdoing myself, even as I get closer to the deadline of summer and the awakeing of a new grade level. I'm going to be a junior (11th grade). Secondly, I may have good ideas, but you've only seen me do that here. We don't know if I be any better elsewhere. I'm not trying limit myself here and I'm not trying to say I won't take a risk, but my timeline means I need to stay here. And three, there has been a recent crime of a sock detected and is now gone, thanks to Josh finding it, and I have to keep my eye any new user that comes through this land hours or a few days after that sock capture. They may say they aren't the person who's blocked, but I can't just loosely fall into trust. Last time I ever did that, the user was revealed to be a criminal. I know you think this is unfair and that possibly accusing people to be a certain criminal is wrong, but I'm trying to be a cautious person. What good is trust when it leads to disappointment and failure? This statement only applies to those who you originally see as good, but then somewhere along the line, they do one ville action that causes you to lose trust in them, which will make it hard for you to trust them again. Like I said before, you may think of what I'm doing as wrong, but at the same time, I'm trying to do the right thing by getting rid of those who want nothing to do with what the community's main work is and want to be rebels and enemies by refusing to follow the rules and not have a care for what others have to say.