Thread:Nightmare9188/@comment-25526836-20150609013346/@comment-4598272-20150609125004

I count your thought, but it isn't right for the reasons I mentioned above. You really have no idea that the ideal admin has to be proportional and efficient rather than banning for infinite without thinking about it. Rather the bad admins do that. But I want to come close to the ideal admin. The wiki would have died a long time ago, if Sky, Jay and Klaus won't have made trouble again. If TKU would have just banned them for infinite without thinking about it they would just have brought the trouble to other wikis. But because me being a crat on this wiki they have to fear another global block, because I'm eager to report them again for the sake of all of Wikia and this makes me a far better leader than TKU. He obviously sees punishing in an autotelic way. But the autotelic way is - as law students learn - the least effective. When punishing someone you also should keep in mind everything else, not only the members of this wiki, but also all other wikis. And thus a global block is far more effective than an infinite local block. Infinite blocks also encourage sockpuppeting. And we have comparably not a major problem with sockpuppeting because we didn't block for infinite. Only Sky sockpuppeted, but most often after global blocks or just to sockpuppet. So I think you should overturn your thought and an apology as Dark suggested also would be appropriate.