Thread:Unity29/@comment-5670835-20150906184157/@comment-4598272-20150908045107

TKU, unfortunately redemption can happen at an earlier or a later time. What would be if you have joined a wiki you like very much at a very young age, acted a bit immature and got blocked forever for that. Then you won't have a chance to ever edit again there for your whole life, except if you make sockpuppets. Isn't that counter-productive? So there are indeed reasons why I discourage infinite blocks. Also neither Dark will apologize to you nor my group will forgive you, if you don't drop the subject with the infinite blocks, So two of the three demands won't be met. Dark is right, when he says you can't get anything you want. There have to be compromises. My group already made one. They agreed upon extending the blocks if a sockpuppet of a blocked user is caught. A one-year block is long enough and users also learn from that. But infinite blocks encourage sockpuppeting and shows missing faith in redemption, even if it comes late. Also I have told you why the argument with too many chances doesn't count. A judge also can't say he gave a criminal too many chances and send him to jail forever. Your blocking system is unprofessional and not well-developed. My group will never forgive you if you don't drop the subject. That's how things are. They are even saying: "What an irrational and unprofessional bureaucrat did we promote once?"