Thread:Nightmare9188/@comment-30185470-20150612235521/@comment-4598272-20150614181336

Staff says they intervene if they think it is the best. If there are a lot of users who complain about the bureaucrats, it is likely that they intervene. The best would be a community concensus, though I think Nbajammer would block users who vote for his demotion and refer to the hubs "no-harassment-and-trolling policy". This was also the goal of the so-called "war", that a lot of users are convinced that Nbajammer is a power abuser who damages wikis with his behaviour and eventually want to get him demoted. Remember, when we fought against Jezz who was a chat mod on Sponge Bob Wiki and a crat on the very small Supercat Wiki. While Supercat Wiki was closed by the founder, Jezz was demoted on Sponge Bob Wiki after there was a concensus supporting the demotion. Jezz blocked us for no good reasons on Supercat Wiki and was blocked back in self-defence. Though we didn't edit Sponge Bob Wiki, enough users were convinced that Jezz isn't worthy to have power after the said events. Of course Tokupedia is a bigger problem than Jezz was because it is a group of bad bureaucrats who run several wikis including bigger ones, while Jezz only was a chat mod on Sponge Bob Wiki and a crat on a very small wiki like Supercat.